ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Beyond Earth, Beyond Time: Preserving Female Fertility in Space Missions.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of female astronauts participating in space missions is increasing, and concerns about the impact of spaceflight on reproductive health have emerged. Space radiation and microgravity pose potential threats to ovarian reserve and uterine function, but data on human female reproductive health in space remain scarce. This review explores current evidence from both real and simulated space conditions, including animal studies and ground-based cosmic radiation models. The relevant literature on cosmic radiation, fertility preservation strategies, and gynecological risk management in spaceflight was analyzed to provide a comprehensive synthesis. Space radiation might damage ovarian follicles and impair folliculogenesis, potentially leading to premature ovarian failure and microgravity might alter endocrine function. While human data are lacking, murine and in vitro model studies suggest significant reproductive risks. Embryo/oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation are currently the most viable fertility preservation strategies. Shielding technologies, radioprotective agents, and hormonal modulation may offer adjunct protection. In conclusions, fertility counseling and preservation should become integral to pre-mission planning for female astronauts of reproductive age. A personalized approach, accounting for individual reproductive goals, age and mission duration, is essential. Further research is urgently needed to understand the reproductive effects of deep space travel and to develop targeted protective strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.