ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
General Innovations in Pain Management.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Technique for Tramadol Dose Accuracy: Are Dosing Pumps the Solution?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Regenerative medicine: Are we at a crossroads for interventional pain medicine or just another phase?Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pain management is constantly evolving, and our literature review aims to describe the general innovations happening within the field. The need for advancements in chronic pain is a necessity, as debilitating back pain and other forms of chronic pain are significant issues in the United States. Traditionally, medications have been the initial treatment options in cases of chronic pain; however, the advancement in pharmacogenetics has led to an increased ability to create more personalized medication plans. Additionally, neuromodulation in spinal cord stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct-current stimulation, and dorsal root ganglion stimulation continue to see increased usage in mainstream chronic pain management. These techniques have continued to prove successful in many chronic pain management cases. They are allowing practicing physicians more confidence in the variety of treatment options. Lastly, great strides have also been made in stem cell and regenerative therapies, such as platelet-rich plasma injections, and artificial intelligence, further advancing the various treatment options and overall efficiency of pain management. This review aims to critically analyze and review the most up-to-date literature within each section mentioned and comprehensively discuss the future of innovation in chronic pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.