ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Theoretical Methods for Assessing the Density of Protein Nanodroplets.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are known to undergo liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), which is a physical process that drives the formation of biomolecular condensates and membraneless organelles in biological cells. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations provide valuable tools to explore both the molecular mechanisms of LLPS and the physical properties of biomolecular condensates. However, a direct comparison of MD simulation results with phase diagrams obtained experimentally is normally prevented not only by the high computational costs of simulating large biomacromolecular systems on sufficient timescales but also by conceptual challenges. Specifically, there currently seems to be no standard or unambiguous method of defining and determining volumes occupied by coexisting phases at the nanoscale, with typically no more than a few hundred biomacromolecules in the simulation box. The goal of this work is to fill in this gap in the methodology. Focusing on α-synuclein as a model IDP, we test and compare three methods for determining the molecular density of protein nanodroplets, or clusters, generated in MD simulations or using other molecular modeling approaches. Two of the methods are based on approximating nanodroplets with homogeneous spheres and ellipsoids, respectively. The third method, which is expected to yield the most physically accurate results, is based on the SPACEBALL algorithm, with optimized, cluster-specific radii for volume probes. Our results contribute to the construction of accurate phase diagrams on the basis of MD simulations of IDP systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.