SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Theranostic Radiopharmaceuticals of Somatostatin Receptors for Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: Agonists Versus Antagonists-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumours: advances, combination strategies, and future directions.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare and heterogeneous class of neoplastic lesions, but their prevalence has increased significantly over the past three decades. These tumors are aggressive and difficult to treat. Improving diagnostic efficiency and treatment effectiveness is important for patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Radiopharmaceutical therapeutic diagnostics combines diagnosis and treatment technology and has broad prospects in precision medicine, especially for the early diagnosis and treatment of tumors. To compare the diagnostic advantages of radiolabeled somatostatin receptor agonists and antagonists for liver metastases from NETs and the disease control rate in NET patients. Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to 29 October 2024. Clinical trials of somatostatin receptor agonists and antagonists for NET diagnosis or treatment. Following PRISMA guidelines, data were independently extracted by two researchers. Pooled diagnostic or treatment effects and 95% CIs were reported using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Effect of somatostatin receptor agonists and antagonists in detecting liver metastases and disease control rate. Risk Ratio (RR) for liver metastasis detection and Effect Size (ES) for disease control rate were calculated. From 5291 articles, 52 were included in the meta-analysis. Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonists were significantly more effective than agonists in detecting liver lesions (RR = 11.57, 95% CI: 4.10, 32.67). Disease control rates were higher with antagonists (ES = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.96) compared to agonists (ES = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.85, z = 2.12,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.