ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Clinical and Molecular Presentation of a Patient with Paternal Uniparental Isodisomy of Chromosome 16.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uniparental disomies (UPDs) are among the causes of imprinting disorders. Specific phenotypes of most causative UPDs have been described. Here, we describe the case of a 2-year-old female patient who presented a syndromic phenotype. Chromosomal microarray analysis revealed UPD of the whole chromosome 16. Microsatellite analysis demonstrated paternal origin of the UPD and its isodisomic pattern (UPiD (16) pat). Mosaic trisomy 16 was not detected using the FISH method. Whole-exome sequencing revealed no pathogenetic genetic variants sufficient to explain the syndromic phenotype nor unmasked pathogenic recessive genetic variants on chromosome 16. Whole-genome trio DNA sequencing revealed no additional candidate pathogenic genetic variants to those detected by whole-exome sequencing, including miRNAs and lncRNAs. Imprinting disorders at 6q24.2, 7p12.2, 7q32.2, 11p15.5, 14q32.2, 15q11.2, and 20q13.32, as well as multilocus imprinting disturbances (MLIDs), were excluded by Methylation-Specific Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MS-MLPA). At the same time, we detected abnormal hypermethylation of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.