ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Exploring the Anticancer Potential of Proton Pump Inhibitors by Targeting GRP78 and V-ATPase: Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics, PCA, and MM-GBSA Calculations.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer cells can adapt to their surrounding microenvironment by upregulating glucose-regulated protein 78 kDa (GRP78) and vacuolar-type ATPase (V-ATPase) proteins to increase their proliferation and resilience to anticancer therapy. Therefore, targeting these proteins can obstruct cancer progression. A comprehensive computational study was conducted to investigate the inhibitory potential of four proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), dexlasnoprazole (DEX), esomeprazole (ESO), pantoprazole (PAN), and rabeprazole (RAB), against GRP78 and V-ATPase. Molecular docking revealed high-affinity scores for PPIs against both proteins. Moreover, molecular dynamics showed favorable root mean square deviation values for GRP78 and V-ATPase complexes, whereas root mean square fluctuations were high at the substrate-binding subdomains of GRP78 complexes and the α-helices of V-ATPase. Meanwhile, the radius of gyration and the surface-accessible surface area of the complexes were not significantly affected by ligand binding. Trajectory projections of the first two principal components showed similar motions of GRP78 structures and the fluctuating nature of V-ATPase structures, while the free-energy landscape revealed the thermodynamically favored GRP78-RAB and V-ATPase-DEX conformations. Furthermore, the binding free energy was -16.59 and -18.97 kcal/mol for GRP78-RAB and V-ATPase-DEX, respectively, indicating their stability. According to our findings, RAB and DEX are promising candidates for GRP78 and V-ATPase inhibition experiments, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.