ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Influence of Sex and Body Size on the Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for Frontal Plane Knee Kinematics During Landings.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) motion capture is inaccessible, and the Microsoft Kinect is an alternative to measure surrogates of knee valgus that may contribute to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk. We evaluated the influence of sex and body size on the agreement between methods. A total of 40 (10 per sex and BMI group) participants were included. The Kinect and motion capture measured knee ankle separation ratio (KASR) and knee abduction angles (KAAs). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) evaluated agreement between methods. 2 (sex) by 2 (BMI) by 2 (method) ANOVA compared kinematics between groups. Agreement between methods was moderate-to-good for KASR (initial contact ICCs 0.667-0.86; peak flexion ICCs 0.766-0.882). Agreement for KAA was low-to-moderate (initial contact ICCs 0.128-0.575; peak flexion ICCs 0.315-0.760). There was a BMI-by-method interaction for KASR at initial contact (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.