ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Improving Intelligent Vehicle Control with a Prediction Model of Passenger Comfort Based on Postural Instability Parameters.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the development of technology, comfort has gradually developed into the main criterion for evaluating intelligent vehicle performances. In this study, a field test was carried out under five common driving conditions, and 60 participants took part. Passenger posture data, vehicle motion data and passenger subjective comfort data were collected. A paired sample T-test and a ridge regression algorithm were used to explore the relationship between passenger posture swing parameters and subjective comfort. The results show that under the same driving conditions, the speed of posture swing was significantly higher for passengers who experienced discomfort. Furthermore, we found that the change in angular velocity was the main cause of passenger discomfort under different driving conditions. This suggested that the design of intelligent vehicle algorithms should focus on the angular velocity variation among passengers. Finally, based on traditional machine learning algorithms and deep learning algorithms, this paper establishes two models for predicting comfort through passenger posture instability. The accuracy of the machine learning model in predicting passenger comfort was 87.1%, while that for the deep learning model was 89%. The findings are useful in providing a theoretical basis for improving the comfort of intelligent vehicles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.