ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Data-Fusion-Based Algorithm for Assessing Threat Levels of Low-Altitude and Slow-Speed Small Targets.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk-Aware Resource Allocation Strategy for Target Tracking in a Cognitive Radar Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-Altitude and Slow-Speed Small (LSS) targets pose significant challenges to air defense systems due to their low detectability and complex maneuverability. To enhance defense capabilities against low-altitude targets and assist in formulating interception decisions, this study proposes a new threat assessment algorithm based on multisource data fusion under visible-light detection conditions. Firstly, threat assessment indicators and their membership functions are defined to characterize LSS targets, and a comprehensive evaluation system is established. To reduce the impact of uncertainties in weight allocation on the threat assessment results, a combined weighting method based on bias coefficients is proposed. The proposed weighting method integrates the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), entropy weighting, and CRITIC methods to optimize the fusion of subjective and objective weights. Subsequently, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory are used to calculate and rank the target threat levels so as to reduce conflicts and uncertainties from heterogeneous data sources. Finally, the effectiveness and reliability of the two methods are verified through simulation experiments and measured data. The experimental results show that the TOPSIS method can significantly discriminate threat values, making it suitable for environments requiring rapid distinction between high- and low-threat targets. The D-S evidence theory, on the other hand, has strong anti-interference capability, making it suitable for environments requiring a balance between subjective and objective uncertainties. Both methods can improve the reliability of threat assessment in complex environments, providing valuable support for air defense command and control systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.