ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Towards a Lightweight Arabic Sign Language Translation System.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a pressing need to build a sign-to-text translation system to simplify communication between deaf and non-deaf people. This study investigates the building of a high-performance, lightweight sign language translation system suitable for real-time applications. Two Saudi Sign Language datasets are used for evaluation. We also investigate the effects of the number of signers and number of repetitions in sign language datasets. To this end, eight experiments are conducted in both signer-dependent and signer-independent modes. A comprehensive ablation study is presented to study the impacts of model components, network depth, and the size of the hidden dimension. The best accuracies achieved are 97.7% and 90.7% for the signer-dependent and signer-independent modes, respectively, using the KSU-SSL dataset. Similarly, the model achieves 98.38% and 96.22% for signer-dependent and signer-independent modes using the ArSL dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.