ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Center-of-Gravity-Aware Graph Convolution for Unsafe Behavior Recognition of Construction Workers.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Falls from height are a critical safety concern in the construction industry, underscoring the need for effective identification of high-risk worker behaviors near hazardous edges for proactive accident prevention. This study aimed to address this challenge by developing an improved action recognition model. We propose a novel dynamic spatio-temporal graph convolutional network (CoG-STGCN) that incorporates a center of gravity (CoG)-aware mechanism. The method computes global and local CoG using anthropometric priors and extracts four key dynamic CoG features, which a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) then uses to generate modulation weights that dynamically adjust the skeleton graph's adjacency matrix, enhancing sensitivity to stability changes. On a self-constructed dataset of eight typical edge-related hazardous behaviors, CoG-STGCN achieved a Top-1 accuracy of 95.83% (baseline ST-GCN: 93.75%) and an average accuracy of 94.17% in fivefold cross-validation (baseline ST-GCN: 92.91%), with significant improvements in recognizing actions involving rapid CoG shifts. The CoG-STGCN provides a more effective and physically informed approach for intelligent unsafe behavior recognition and early warning in built environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.