Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40942916›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Gallstone Classification Using Random Forest Optimized by Sand Cat Swarm Optimization Algorithm with SHAP and DiCE-Based Interpretability.

Proshenjit Sarker, Jun-Jiat Tiang, Abdullah-Al Nahid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Proshenjit SarkerElectronics and Communication Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0008-9502-2152
Jun-Jiat TiangCentre for Wireless Technology, CoE for Intelligent Network, Faculty of Artificial Intelligence & Engineering, Multimedia University, Persiaran Multimedia, Cyberjaya 63100, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-1178-9356
Abdullah-Al NahidElectronics and Communication Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-2391-5767

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallstone disease affects approximately 10-20% of the global adult population, with early diagnosis being essential for effective treatment and management. While image-based machine learning (ML) models have shown high accuracy in gallstone detection, tabular data approaches remain less explored. In this study, we have proposed a Random Forest (RF) classifier optimized using the Sand Cat Swarm Optimization (SCSO) algorithm for gallstone prediction based on a tabular dataset. Our experiments have been conducted across four frameworks: only RF without cross-validation (CV), RF with CV, RF-SCSO without CV, and RF-SCSO with CV. Only RF without CV model has achieved 81.25%, 79.07%, 85%, and 73.91% accuracy, F-score, precision, and recall, respectively, using all 38 features, while the RF with CV has obtained a 10-fold cross-validation accuracy of 78.42% using the same feature set. With SCSO-based feature reduction, the RF-SCSO without and with CV models have delivered a comparable accuracy of 79.17% and 78.32%, respectively, using only 13 features, indicating effective dimensionality reduction. SHAP analysis has identified CRP, Vitamin D, and AAST as the most influential features, and DiCE has further illustrated the model's behavior by highlighting corrective counterfactuals for misclassified instances. These findings demonstrate the potential of interpretable, feature-optimized ML models for gallstone diagnosis using structured clinical data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGallstonesHumansMachine LearningRandom ForestDiCEgallstonemachine learningrandom forest classifierSand Cat Swarm OptimizationSHAP

Identifiers

PMID40942916
PMCPMC12431373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.