ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
QAMT: An LLM-Based Framework for Quality-Assured Medical Time-Series Data Generation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The extensive deployment of diverse sensors in hospitals has resulted in the collection of various medical time-series data. However, these real-world medical time-series data suffer from limited volume, poor data quality, and privacy concerns, resulting in performance degradation in downstream tasks, such as medical research and clinical decision-making. Existing studies provide generated medical data as a supplement or alternative to real-world data. However, medical time-series data are inherently complex, including temporal data such as laboratory measurements and static event data such as demographics and clinical outcomes, with each patient's temporal data being influenced by their static event data. This intrinsic complexity makes the generation of high-quality medical time-series data particularly challenging. Traditional methods typically employ Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) or Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), but these methods struggle to generate high-quality static event data of medical time-series data and often lack interpretability. Currently, large language models (LLMs) introduce new opportunities for medical data generation, but they face difficulties in generating temporal data and have challenges in specific domain generation tasks. In this study, we are the first to propose an LLM-based framework for modularly generating medical time-series data, QAMT, which generates quality-assured data and ensures the interpretability of the generation process. QAMT constructs a reliable health knowledge graph to provide medical expertise to the LLMs and designs dual modules to simultaneously generate static event data and temporal data, constituting high-quality medical time-series data. Moreover, QAMT introduces a quality assurance module to evaluate the generated data. Unlike existing methods, QAMT preserves the interpretability of the data generation process. Experimental results show that QAMT can generate higher-quality time-series medical data compared with existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.