Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40942903›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Sensor-Agnostic, LSTM-Based Human Motion Prediction Using sEMG Data.

Bon Ho Koo, Ho Chit Siu, Lonnie G Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bon Ho KooDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2152-8771
Ho Chit SiuMIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA 02421, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3451-8046
Lonnie G PetersenDepartment of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5155-9651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of surface electromyography (sEMG) for conventional motion classification and prediction has had limitations due to sensor hardware differences. With the popularization of deep learning-based approaches to the application of motion prediction, this study explores the effects that different hardware sensor platforms have on the performance of a deep learning neural network trained to predict the one-degree-of-freedom (DoF) angular trajectory of a human. Two different sEMG sensor platforms were used to collect raw data from subjects conducting exercises, which was used to train a neural network designed to predict the future angular trajectory of the arm. The results show that the raw data originating from different sensor hardware with different configurations (including the communication method, data acquisition unit (DAQ) usage, electrode configuration, buffering method, preprocessing method, and experimental variables like the sampling frequency) produced bi-LSTM networks that performed similarly. This points to the hardware-agnostic nature of such deep learning networks.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansMotionMovementNeural Networks, Computerdeep learningLSTMmotion predictionsurface electromyography

Identifiers

PMID40942903
PMCPMC12431480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.