ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Opioid Detection Using Smartphone-Based Eye-Scanning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Opioids are known to constrict pupils, and mobile phone-based self-administered eye scanning (MPSES) offers a potential method for monitoring opioid use in real-world settings. A clinical trial with 12 volunteers measured pupil size using MPSES under different light conditions (approx. 50 or approx. 500 lux) in the lab and over a week at home. Each participant made approximately 21 home tests, 12 in the lab without oxycodone and 16 in the lab after oxycodone intake. At the second visit the participants received a single dose of 20 mg oxycodone, and their pupil size was monitored hourly for 5 h. The pupil size after oxycodone intake was compared to drug-naïve tests performed at the lab and at home. Logistic regression models were built using measured pupil size and light conditions measured by the phone during each test, and a dichotomous variable indicating tests before or after oxycodone dosing as the outcome. The model demonstrated high classification accuracy (AUC = 0.94), with 82% true positives, 9% false positives, 91% true negatives and 18% false negatives. Misclassifications were largely due to difficulties measuring pupil size in individuals with corneal arcus, causing most of the false positive findings, and other interindividual differences. This shows that MPSES, including monitoring of ambient light conditions, can effectively detect opioid use within the 50-500 lux range. Our study paves the way for using MPSES to detect opioid use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.