ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Concise Review of State-of-the-Art Sensing Technologies for Bridge Structural Health Monitoring.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Against the backdrop of increasing demands for the safety and longevity of the bridge infrastructure, this review synthesizes the recent advances in structural health monitoring (SHM) sensing systems. Carbon nanotube (CNT), piezoelectric, RFID, wireless, fiber optic, and computer-vision-based sensing are thoroughly explored and elucidated in the existing literature survey that distills their working principles, documented deployments, and anticipated research directions. CNT sensors detect minute resistance variations for strain and crack surveillance; piezoelectric devices transduce mechanical stimuli into high-resolution electrical signals; RFID tags combine location tracking with modular sensing and wireless data relay; and wireless sensing technology integrates sensor nodes with microprocessors and communication modules, which can facilitate efficient data processing and autonomous management. Fiber optic sensing technology, known for precision and interference resistance, is ideal for high-precision monitoring under strong electromagnetic interference conditions, and vision-based systems emulate human perception to extract geometric descriptors via image analytics. The comparative analysis reveals complementary strengths that guide practitioners in selecting optimal sensor suites for specific bridge conditions. The findings underscore the transformative role of these technologies in enhancing SHM reliability and suggest that synergistic integration with robotics and emerging materials will further advance future resilient monitoring frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.