ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Feasibility Study of Automated Detection and Classification of Signals in Distributed Acoustic Sensing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- S2-DyGNN: A Spectro-Spatial Dynamic Graph Neural Network for Acoustic Event Classification in Distributed Acoustic Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- MAEPD: A Foundation Model for Distributed Acoustic Sensing Signal Recognition via Masked Autoencoder Pre-Training and Adapter-Based Prompt Tuning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) is an emerging technology in the maritime domain, enabling the use of existing fiber optic cables to detect acoustic signals in the marine environment. In this study, we present an automated signal detection and classification framework for DAS data that supports near-real-time processing. Using data from the SHEFA-2 cable between the Faroe and Shetland Islands, we develop a method to identify acoustic signals and generate both labeled and unlabeled datasets based on their spectral characteristics. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used to explore separability in the labeled data, and Hierarchical Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN) is applied to classify unlabeled data. Experimental validation using clustering metrics shows that with the full dataset, we can achieve a Davies-Bouldin Index of 0.828, a Silhouette Score of 0.124, and a Calinski-Harabasz Index of 189.8. The clustering quality degrades significantly when more than 20% of the labeled data is excluded, highlighting the importance of maintaining sufficient labeled samples for robust classification. Our results demonstrate the potential to distinguish between signal sources such as ships, vehicles, earthquakes, and possible cable damage, offering valuable insights for maritime monitoring and security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.