ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimizing Deep Learning-Based Crack Detection Using No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in a Mobile Tunnel Scanning System.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research on Synthetic Data Methods and Detection Models for Micro-Cracks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mobile tunnel scanning system (MTSS) enables efficient tunnel inspection; however, motion blur (MB) generated at high travel speeds remains a major factor undermining the reliability of deep-learning-based crack detection. This study focuses on investigating how horizontally oriented MB in MTSS imagery affects the crack-detection performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and proposes a data-centric quality-assurance framework that leverages no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) to optimize model performance. By intentionally applying MB to both public and real-world MTSS datasets, we analyzed performance changes in ResNet-, VGG-, and AlexNet-based models and established the correlations between four NR-IQA metrics (BRISQUE, NIQE, PIQE, and CPBD) and performance (F1 score). As the MB intensity increased, the F1 score of ResNet34 dropped from 89.43% to 4.45%, confirming the decisive influence of image quality. PIQE and CPBD exhibited strong correlations with F1 (-0.87 and +0.82, respectively), emerging as the most suitable indicators for horizontal MB. Using thresholds of PIQE ≤ 20 and CPBD ≥ 0.8 to filter low-quality images improved the AlexNet F1 score by 1.46%, validating the effectiveness of the proposed methodology. The proposed framework objectively assesses MTSS data quality and optimizes deep learning performance, enhancing the reliability of intelligent infrastructure maintenance systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.