ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Camera, LiDAR, and IMU Spatiotemporal Calibration: Methodological Review and Research Perspectives.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Online Bias Estimation for Single-Platform Airborne Radar Using Bias-Subspace Information-Guided MAP-EKF.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GPIS-Based Calibration for Non-Overlapping Dual-LiDAR Systems Using a 2.5D Calibration Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Outdoor Characterization and Geometry-Aware Error Modelling of an RGB-D Stereo Camera for Safety-Related Obstacle Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-sensor fusion systems involving Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), cameras, and inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been widely adopted in fields such as autonomous driving and robotics due to their complementary perception capabilities. This widespread application has led to a growing demand for accurate sensor calibration. Although numerous calibration methods have been proposed in recent years for various sensor combinations, such as camera-IMU, LiDAR-IMU, camera-LiDAR, and camera-LiDAR-IMU, there remains a lack of systematic reviews and comparative analyses of these approaches. This paper focuses on extrinsic calibration techniques for LiDAR, cameras, and IMU, providing a comprehensive review of the latest developments across the four types of sensor combinations. We further analyze the strengths and limitations of existing methods, summarize the evaluation criteria for calibration, and outline potential future research directions for the benefit of the academic community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.