Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40942835›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Deep Learning Image-Based Classification for Post-Earthquake Damage Level Prediction Using UAVs.

Norah Alsaaran, Adel Soudani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Norah AlsaaranComputer Science Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9583-0565
Adel SoudaniComputer Science Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0397-9843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) integrated with lightweight deep learning models represent an effective solution for image-based rapid post-earthquake damage assessment. UAVs, equipped with cameras, capture high-resolution aerial imagery of disaster-stricken areas, providing essential data for evaluating structural damage. When paired with light eight Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models, these UAVs can process the captured images onboard, enabling real-time, accurate damage level predictions that might with potential interest to orient efficiently the efforts of the Search and Rescue (SAR) teams. This study investigates the use of the MobileNetV3-Small lightweight CNN model for real-time post-earthquake damage level prediction using UAV-captured imagery. The model is trained to classify three levels of post-earthquake damage, ranging from no damage to severe damage. Experimental results show that the adapted MobileNetV3-Small model achieves the lowest FLOPs, with a significant reduction of 58.8% compared to the ShuffleNetv2 model. Fine-tuning the last five layers resulted in a slight increase of approximately 0.2% in FLOPs, but significantly improved accuracy and robustness, yielding a 4.5% performance boost over the baseline. The model achieved a weighted average F-score of 0.93 on a merged dataset composed of three post-earthquake damage level datasets. It was successfully deployed and tested on a Raspberry Pi 5, demonstrating its feasibility for edge-device applications. This deployment highlighted the model's efficiency and real-time performance in resource-constrained environments.

Indexed as

convolutional neural network (CNN)deep learningearthquakeedge computingMobileNetreal-time damage assessmentunmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)

Identifiers

PMID40942835
PMCPMC12431617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.