ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Speckle Noise Reduction in Digital Holography by 3D Adaptive Filtering.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital holography enables the reconstruction of both 2D and 3D object information from interference patterns captured by digital cameras. A major challenge in this field is speckle noise, which significantly degrades the quality of the reconstructed images. We propose a novel speckle noise reduction method based on 3D adaptive filtering. Our technique processes a stack of holograms, each with an uncorrelated speckle pattern, using an adapted 3D Frost filter. Unlike conventional filtering techniques, our approach exploits statistical adaptivity to enhance noise suppression while preserving fine image details in the reconstructed holograms. Both numerical simulations and optical experiments confirm that our 3D filtering technique significantly enhances reconstruction quality. Specifically, it reduces the normalized standard deviation by up to 40% and improves the structural similarity index by up to 60% compared to classical 2D, 3D median, BM3D, and BM4D filters. Optical experiments validate the method's effectiveness in practical digital holography scenarios by local and global image quality estimation metrics. These results highlight adaptive 3D filtering as a promising approach for mitigating speckle noise while maintaining structural integrity in digital holography reconstructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.