Observational studySensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Time-Domain Analysis of Low- and High-Frequency Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Sensor Technologies for Characterization of Cerebral Pressure-Flow and Oxygen Delivery Physiology: A Prospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebrovascular reactivity, cerebral autoregulation (CA), and oxygen delivery can be measured continuously and in a non-invasive fashion using cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Although the literature is limited surrounding the difference between signals acquired and derived from low (<100 Hz) and high sampling rates (≥100 Hz). As part of a prospective observational study, we preliminarily explored and assessed the difference in the information provided by two NIRS systems using regional cerebral oxygen saturation and cerebral oximetry index signals at low and high sampling rates. The raw data in two frequencies (down-sampled to 1 Hz using the mean and up-sampled to 250 Hz) were decimated to focus on slow-wave vasogenic fluctuations associated with CA. Then, the data were analyzed using various statistical methods such as the absolute signal difference, Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman agreement, Cross-correlation function, optimal time-series autocorrelative structure, time-series impulse response function, and Granger causality relationships. The results of the various statistical analyses indicated that the signals obtained using high-frequency NIRS were different from signals obtained from low-frequency NIRS of the same cerebral region. Hence, high-frequency NIRS systems may possibly contain better signal features compared to NIRS systems with low sampling rates, but further work is required to assess high-frequency NIRS in other healthy and cranial trauma populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.