Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40942785›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Large Kernel Convolutional Neural Network with a Noise Transfer Mechanism for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation.

Jinhang Liu, Yuhe Du, Jing Wang, Xing Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinhang LiuSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5509-0846
Yuhe DuSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Jing WangSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Xing TangSchool of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4833-8604

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62472149,62302155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In semantic segmentation tasks, large kernels and Atrous convolution have been utilized to increase the receptive field, enabling models to achieve competitive performance with fewer parameters. However, due to the fixed size of kernel functions, networks incorporating large convolutional kernels are limited in adaptively capturing multi-scale features and fail to effectively leverage global contextual information. To address this issue, we combine Atrous convolution with large kernel convolution, using different dilation rates to compensate for the single-scale receptive field limitation of large kernels. Simultaneously, we employ a dynamic selection mechanism to adaptively highlight the most important spatial features based on global information. Additionally, to enhance the model's ability to fit the true label distribution, we propose a Multi-Scale Contextual Noise Transfer Matrix (NTM), which uses high-order consistency information from neighborhood representations to estimate NTM and correct supervision signals, thereby improving the model's generalization capability. Extensive experiments conducted on Cityscapes, ADE20K, and COCO-Stuff-10K demonstrate that this approach achieves a new state-of-the-art balance between speed and accuracy. Specifically, LKNTNet achieves 80.05% mIoU on Cityscapes with an inference speed of 80.7 FPS and 42.7% mIoU on ADE20K with an inference speed of 143.6 FPS.

Indexed as

computer visionlarge kernel convolutionnoise transfer mechanismposition awarenessreal-time semantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID40942785
PMCPMC12431489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.