Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40942778›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Large-Scale Continuous Monitoring of Greenhouse Gases with Adaptive LoRaWAN in CN470-510 MHz Band.

Xueying Jin, David Chieng, Pushpendu Kar, Chiew Foong Kwong, Yeqin Li, Yin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xueying JinNext-Generation Internet of Everything Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China.
David ChiengNext-Generation Internet of Everything Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9674-3436
Pushpendu KarSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0896-0650
Chiew Foong KwongNext-Generation Internet of Everything Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7857-511X
Yeqin LiNext-Generation Internet of Everything Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China.
Yin WangHealthyPhoton Technology Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315042, China.

Funding

Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau 2023S049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous and near-real-time monitoring of greenhouse gases (GHGs) is critical for achieving Net Zero emissions, ensuring early detection, compliance, accountability, and adaptive management. To this end, there is an increasing need to monitor GHGs at higher temporal resolutions, greater spatial resolutions, and larger coverage scales. However, spatial resolution and coverage remain significant challenges due to limited sensor network coverage and power sources for sensor nodes, even in urban areas. LoRaWAN, a cost-effective solution that provides long-range and high-penetration wireless connectivity with a low energy consumption, is an ideal choice for this application. Despite its promise, LoRaWAN faces several challenges, including a low data rate, low packet transmission rate, and low packet delivery success ratio, especially when the node density or environment variability is high. This paper presents a simulation-based analysis of a large-scale urban LoRaWAN sensor network operating in the CN470-510 MHz band, which is the only frequency band officially designated for low-power wide-area (LPWA) technologies such as LoRaWAN in China. This study investigates how the node density, sensor measurement update rate (i.e., update interval), and sensor measurement payload size affect two primary performance metrics: the sensor update delivery ratio (DR) and the radio frequency (RF) energy consumption (RFEC) per successful update. The performances of several enhanced adaptive data transmission algorithms in comparison to the conventional ADR+ algorithms are also analysed. The results indicate that both DR and RFEC are significantly influenced by the node density, sensor update rate, and payload size, with the effects being particularly significant under high-node-density and high-update-rate conditions. The analysis further reveals that the ADR-NODE-KAMA algorithm consistently achieves the best performance across most scenarios, providing up to a 2% improvement in DR and a reduction of 10-15 mJ in RFEC per successful sensor measurement update. Additionally, the sensor measurement payload size is shown to have a substantial impact on network performance, with each added sensor measurement contributing to a DR reduction of up to 2.24% and an increase in RFEC of approximately 80 mJ. LoRaWAN network operators can gain practical insights from these findings to optimize the performance and efficiency of large-scale GHG monitoring deployments.

Indexed as

adaptive data rateGHG monitoringlong-range wireless area networkLoRaWANsensor network

Identifiers

PMID40942778
PMCPMC12431324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.