ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Metaheuristic-Driven Feature Selection for Human Activity Recognition on KU-HAR Dataset Using XGBoost Classifier.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decision tree with randomized grid search-based hyperparameter tuning and optimal feature scaling for diabetes diagnosis.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human activity recognition (HAR) is an automated technique for identifying human activities using images and sensor data. Although numerous studies exist, most of the models proposed are highly complex and rely on deep learning. This research utilized two novel frameworks based on the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) classifier, also known as the XGBoost classifier, enhanced with metaheuristic algorithms: Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO) and War Strategy Optimization (WARSO). This study utilized the KU-HAR dataset, which was collected from smartphone accelerometer and gyroscope sensors. We extracted 48 mathematical features to convey the HAR information. GJO-XGB achieved a mean accuracy in 10-fold cross-validation of 93.55% using only 23 out of 48 features. However, WARSO-XGB outperformed GJO-XGB and other traditional classifiers, achieving a mean accuracy, F-score, precision, and recall of 94.04%, 92.88%, 93.47%, and 92.40%, respectively. GJO-XGB has shown lower standard deviations on the test set (accuracy: 0.200; F-score: 0.285; precision: 0.388; recall: 0.336) compared to WARSO-XGB, indicating a more stable performance. WARSO-XGB exhibited lower time complexity, with average training and testing times of 30.84 s and 0.51 s, compared to 39.40 s and 0.81 s for GJO-XGB. After performing 10-fold cross-validation using various external random seeds, GJO-XGB and WARSO-XGB achieved accuracies of 93.80% and 94.19%, respectively, with a random seed = 20. SHAP identified that range_gyro_x, max_acc_z, mean_gyro_x, and some other features are the most informative features for HAR. The SHAP analysis also involved a discussion of the individual predictions, including the misclassifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.