ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Classification of Different Motor Imagery Tasks with the Same Limb Using Electroencephalographic Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding multi-class motor attempt from the affected unilateral limbs in chronic stroke patients.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke is a neurological condition that often results in long-term motor deficits. Given the high prevalence of motor impairments worldwide, there is a critical need to explore innovative neurorehabilitation strategies that aim to enhance the quality of life of patients. One promising approach involves brain-computer interface (BCI) systems controlled by electroencephalographic (EEG) signals elicited when a subject performs motor imagery (MI), which is the mental simulation of movement without actual execution. Such systems have shown potential for facilitating motor recovery by promoting neuroplastic mechanisms. Controlling BCI systems based on MI-EEG signals involves the following sequential stages: recording the raw signal, preprocessing, feature extraction and selection, and classification. Each of these stages can be executed using several techniques and numerous parameter combinations. In this study, we searched for the combination of feature extraction technique, time window, frequency range, and classifier that could provide the best classification accuracy for the BCI Competition 2008 IV 2a benchmark dataset (BCI-C), characterized by EEG-MI data of different limbs (four classes, of which three were used in this work), and the NeuroSCP EEG-MI dataset, a custom experimental protocol developed in our laboratory, consisting of EEG recordings of different movements with the same limb (three classes-right dominant arm). The mean classification accuracy for BCI-C was 76%. When the subjects were evaluated individually, the best-case classification accuracy was 94% and the worst case was 54%. For the NeuroSCP dataset, the average classification result was 53%. The individual subject's evaluation best-case was 71% and the worst case was 35%, which is close to the chance level (33%). These results indicate that techniques commonly applied to classify different limb MI based on EEG features cannot perform well when classifying different MI tasks with the same limb. Therefore, we propose other techniques, such as EEG functional connectivity, as a feature that could be tested in future works to classify different MI tasks of the same limb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.