ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhancing Real-World Fall Detection Using Commodity Devices: A Systematic Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread adoption of smartphones and smartwatches has enabled non-intrusive fall detection through built-in sensors and on-device computation. While these devices are widely used by older adults, existing systems still struggle to accurately detect soft falls in real-world settings. There is a notable drop in performance when fall-detection models trained offline on labeled accelerometer data are deployed and tested in real-world conditions using streaming, real-time data. To address this, our experimental study investigates whether incorporating additional sensor modalities, specifically gyroscope data with accelerometer data from wrist and hip locations, can help bridge this performance gap. Through systematic experimentation, we demonstrated that combining accelerometer data from the hip and the wrist yields a model capable of achieving an F1-score of 88% using a Transformer-based neural network in offline evaluation, which is an improvement of 8% over a model trained solely on wrist accelerometer data. However, when it is deployed in an uncontrolled home environment with streaming real-time data, this model produced a high number of false positives. To address this, we retrained the model using feedback data that comprised both false positives and true positives and was collected from ten participants during real-time testing. This refinement yielded an F1-sore of 92% and significantly reduced false positives while maintaining comparable accuracy in detecting true falls in real-world settings. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the improved model generalizes well to older adults' movement patterns, with minimal false-positive detections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.