ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Electromyographic and Kinematic Analysis of the Upper Limb During Drinking and Eating Using a Wearable Device Prototype.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of a Multimodal Wearable Device Integrating EMG and IMU Sensors for Monitoring Upper Limb Function During Tooth Brushing Activities of Daily Living.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The assessment of upper limb (UL) movement patterns plays a critical role in the rehabilitation of individuals with motor impairments resulting from neuromotor disorders, which significantly affect essential activities of daily living (ADLs) such as drinking and eating. However, conventional clinical evaluation methods often lack objective and quantitative insights into the biomechanics of movement. To enable accurate identification of pathological patterns, it is first necessary to establish normative biomechanical and electrophysiological benchmarks in healthy individuals. In this study, a previously developed, low-cost, wearable, and portable prototype device was employed to objectively assess UL movement. The system, specifically designed for clinical applicability, integrates surface electromyography (EMG) sensors and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) to capture muscle activity and kinematic data, respectively. Thirty healthy participants were recruited to perform standardized drinking and eating tasks. The analysis focused on characterizing muscle activation patterns and joint range of motion during different task phases. Results revealed consistent variations in muscle contraction and joint kinematics, allowing the identification of distinct activation profiles for key shoulder muscles. The findings contribute to the establishment of a normative dataset that can serve as a reference for the assessment of clinical populations. Such data are essential for informing rehabilitation strategies and developing predictive models of UL function during ADLs in individuals with neuromotor disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.