SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Intention Prediction for Active Upper-Limb Exoskeletons in Industrial Applications: A Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Different Controllers for Sensing-Based Movement Intention Estimation and Safe Tracking in a Simulated LSTM Network-Based Elbow Exoskeleton Robot.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intention prediction is essential for enabling intuitive and adaptive control in upper-limb exoskeletons, especially in dynamic industrial environments. However, the suitability of different cues, sensors, and computational models for real-world industrial applications remains unclear. This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, analyzes 29 studies published between 2007 and 2024 that investigate intention prediction in active exoskeletons. Most studies rely on motion capture (14) and electromyography (14) to estimate joint torque or trajectories, predicting from 450 ms before to 660 ms after motion onset. Approaches include model-based and model-free regression, as well as classification methods, but vary significantly in complexity, sensor setups, and evaluation procedures. Only a subset evaluates usability or support effectiveness, often under laboratory conditions with small, non-representative participant groups. Based on these insights, we outline recommendations for robust and adaptable intention prediction tailored to industrial task requirements. We propose four generalized support modes to guide sensor selection and control strategies in practical applications. Future research should leverage wearable sensors, integrate cognitive and contextual cues, and adopt transfer learning, federated learning, or LLM-based feedback mechanisms. Additionally, studies should prioritize real-world validation, diverse participant samples, and comprehensive evaluation metrics to support scalable, acceptable deployment of exoskeletons in industrial settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.