ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Mechanism and Optimized Design Methodology of Steel Plate Reinforcement for Tunnel Lining Void Zones.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voids behind tunnel linings are common hidden defects in underground engineering, leading to reduced structural capacity and potential safety hazards. To address the deficiencies in the understanding of the mechanism and the optimization of design of the existing steel plate reinforcement methods, this study systematically investigates the reinforcement mechanisms and proposes refined design strategies through numerical simulations and experimental validation. First, a comparative analysis of the Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) model and the Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) revealed that the CDP model exhibits superior accuracy and computational efficiency in simulating large-scale void linings. Second, the effectiveness of different reinforcement schemes (chemical anchor bolts alone, structural adhesive alone, and combined systems) was evaluated, demonstrating that structural adhesive dominates stress transfer, while chemical anchor bolts primarily prevent plate detachment. Through further optimization simulations of the steel plate spacing, it was found that a spacing of 0.25 m can balance the reinforcement effect and cost. This spacing restricts the maximum principal stress (1.83 MPa) below the tensile strength of concrete while essentially eliminating damage to the lower surface of the lining. An optimized steel plate reinforcement structure was ultimately proposed. By reducing the number of chemical anchor bolts and decreasing their size (with only M12 chemical anchor bolts arranged at the edges), local damage is minimized while maintaining reinforcement efficiency. The research results provide theoretical support and engineering guidance for the safe repair of tunnel void areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.