Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40942548›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Critical Questions Surrounding the Shot-Blasting Treatment of Titanium Dental Implants.

Javier Gil, Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, Loreto Monsalve-Guil, Jesús Moreno-Muñoz, José Luis Rondón-Romero, Nuno Matos-Garrido, Álvaro Jiménez-Guerra, Enrique Núñez-Márquez, Iván Ortiz-García

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Javier GilBioinspired Oral Biomaterials and Interfaces, Departament of Materials Science and Engineeering, Escola d'Enginyeria Barcelona Est, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Av. Eduard Maristany 16, 08019 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6824-1412
Eugenio Velasco-OrtegaComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0228-484X
Loreto Monsalve-GuilComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.
Jesús Moreno-MuñozComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0157-9643
José Luis Rondón-RomeroComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.
Nuno Matos-GarridoComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.
Álvaro Jiménez-GuerraComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.
Enrique Núñez-MárquezComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.
Iván Ortiz-GarcíaComprehensive Dentistry for Adults and Gerodontology, Master in Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review addresses four controversial aspects of shot blasting in the surface treatment of titanium dental implants. Shot blasting, which involves the projection of abrasive particles onto the titanium surface, is widely used to achieve surface roughness that promotes osteoblastic activity and, consequently, high levels of osseointegration. The first issue examined is the effect of residual alumina particles that remain embedded in the titanium surface after blasting. It has been shown that these residues-typically not exceeding 8% of the surface-can actually enhance osseointegration and even exhibit mild bactericidal properties. The second issue concerns the use of titanium dioxide particles for blasting. Our findings indicate that due to its low abrasiveness, titanium dioxide produces minimal surface roughness and low surface energy, resulting in limited osteoblastic adhesion, inferior fatigue performance, and reduced osseointegration compared to alumina-blasted surfaces. The third topic focuses on the role of compressive residual stress induced by grit blasting. Residual stress contributes to increased surface hydrophilicity, enhancing osteoblast adhesion and mineralization, as evidenced by elevated alkaline phosphatase levels. Finally, the fourth issue involves the effect of acid etching following grit blasting. This treatment introduces microroughness superimposed on the macroroughness generated by grit blasting. In vivo studies demonstrate that grit blasting is the primary driver of osseointegration, while acid etching provides only a marginal improvement in bone-implant contact.

Indexed as

bacteriadental implantsgrit blastingosseointegrationroughnesstitanium

Identifiers

PMID40942548
PMCPMC12430051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.