ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multi-Field Coupling- and Data-Driven-Based Optimization of Cooling Process Parameters for Planetary Rolling Rolls.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the three-roll planetary rolling process, excessively high surface temperature of the rolls can easily lead to copper adhesion, deterioration of roll surface quality, shortened rolling lifespan, and severely affect the quality of copper tube products as well as production efficiency. To improve the cooling efficiency of the roll cooling system, this study developed a fluid-solid-heat coupled model and validated it experimentally to investigate the effects of nozzle diameter, spray angle, and axial position of the spray ring on the cooling performance of the roll surface. Given the low computational efficiency of finite element simulations, three machine learning models-Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)-were introduced and evaluated to identify the most suitable predictive model. Subsequently, the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm was employed to optimize the geometric parameters of the spray ring. The results show that the maximum deviation between the coupled model predictions and experimental data was 4.36%, meeting engineering accuracy requirements. Among the three machine learning models, the RF model demonstrated the best performance, achieving RMSE, MAE, and R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.