ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Dynamic Fracture Strength Prediction of HPFRC Using a Feature-Weighted Linear Ensemble Approach.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Multiple Influences on the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Fibre-Reinforced Backfill Using a GWO-LGBM Model.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Owing to its excellent crack resistance and durability, High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (HPFRC) has been extensively applied in engineering structures exposed to extreme loading conditions. The Mode I dynamic fracture strength of HPFRC under high-strain-rate conditions exhibits significant strain-rate sensitivity and nonlinear response characteristics. However, existing experimental methods for strength measurement are limited by high costs and the absence of standardized testing protocols. Meanwhile, conventional data-driven models for strength prediction struggle to achieve both high-precision prediction and physical interpretability. To address this, this study introduces a dynamic fracture strength prediction method based on a feature-weighted linear ensemble (FWL) mechanism. A comprehensive database comprising 161 sets of high-strain-rate test data on HPFRC fracture strength was first constructed. Key modeling variables were then identified through correlation analysis and an error-driven feature selection approach. Subsequently, six representative machine learning models (KNN, RF, SVR, LGBM, XGBoost, MLPNN) were employed as base learners to construct two types of ensemble models, FWL and Voting, enabling a systematic comparison of their performance. Finally, the predictive mechanisms of the models were analyzed for interpretability at both global and local scales using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) methods. The results demonstrate that the FWL model achieved optimal predictive performance on the test set (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.