ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Curve-Based Infill Pattern Optimization for 3D Printed Polymeric Scaffolds for Trabecular Bone Applications.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D-Printed PLA/HA Composite Scaffolds: Balancing Mechanical Properties for Bone Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing technology, specifically material extrusion, offers great potential for scaffold manufacturing in tissue engineering. This study presents a novel methodology for the design and optimization of 3D printed polymeric scaffolds to enhance cell viability, thereby promoting improved cell proliferation for tissue engineering applications. Different infill patterns, including gyroid, parallel sinusoidal, and symmetric sinusoidal, were evaluated to determine their impact on cell proliferation and tissue regeneration. To overcome the limitations of existing slicer software, a novel open-source software called FullControl GCode Designer was utilized, enabling the creation of customized infill patterns without restrictions. VOLCO software was employed to generate voxelized 3D models of the scaffolds, simulating the material extrusion process. Finite element analysis was conducted using Abaqus software to evaluate the mechanical properties of the different designs. Additionally, new scripts were developed to evaluate the interconnectivity and pore size of the voxelized models. A factorial design of experiments and a genetic algorithm (combined with Kriging metamodels) were applied to identify the optimal configuration based on optimization criteria (keeping the mechanical stiffness and pore size within the recommended values for trabecular bone and maximizing the surface and interconnectivity). Biological testing was conducted on polylactic acid scaffolds to preliminarily validate the effectiveness of the modeling and optimization methodologies in this regard. The results demonstrated the agreement between the optimization methodology and the biological test since the optimum in both cases was a symmetric sinusoidal pattern design with a configuration resulting in a structure with 53.08% porosity and an equivalent pore size of 584 µm. Therefore, this outcome validates the proposed methodologies, emphasizing the role of pore surface area and interconnectivity in supporting cell proliferation. Overall, this research contributes to the advancement of AM technology in tissue engineering and paves the way for further optimization studies in scaffold design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.