Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40942468›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Wood-Plastic Composites: Manufacturing, Rheology and Processing and Process Modeling.

Krzysztof Wilczyński, Kamila Buziak, Adam Wilczyński

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Krzysztof WilczyńskiThe Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineeering, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1612-9178
Kamila BuziakThe Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineeering, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-4068
Adam WilczyńskiPolymerSoft, 85-063 Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wood-plastic composites (WPCs) are polymeric materials, usually thermoplastic, filled with wood flour or fibers. They are relatively durable and stiff and resistant to water. They are also, importantly, relatively cheap compared to materials with similar properties. The WPCs market has grown significantly in recent years, mainly thanks to the increasing construction and automotive markets. Currently, the global WPCs market is forecasted to reach about USD 15 billion by 2030, increasing at an impressive compound annual increase rate of about 12% until 2030. There are some review articles on WPCs written from many different points of view, e.g., the type of materials used (polymers, fillers, auxiliaries), the method of manufacturing and processing, processing properties (thermal and rheological) and functional properties, methods of designing composite products and designing (modeling) forming processes. In this article, we will summarize these different points of view and will present a thorough literature review of rheology and material processing, and more specifically, the modeling of WPCs processing. This work will be presented in relation to state-of-the-art research in the field of modeling the processing of other polymeric materials, i.e., standard (neat) polymers and polymer blends. The WPCs' processing is significantly different from that of standard plastics due to the differences in thermo-rheological properties, diverse structures, etc. So far, the global WPCs processing models have only been developed for both gravity-fed and starve-fed single-screw extrusion. The models for twin-screw extrusion, both co-rotating and counter-rotating, as well as for injection molding, have still not been developed. WPCs show a yield stress and wall slip when extruding, which must be considered when modeling the process. As the slippage on the screw and barrel grows, the process throughput and pressure diminish, but as the slippage on the die grows, the throughput grows and the pressure diminish. As the yield stress in the screw grows, the process throughput and pressure grow, whereas as the yield stress in the die grows, the throughput diminishes and the pressure grows.

Indexed as

extrusioninjection moldingprocess modelingrheologyslip effectsviscositywood–plastic compositesyield stress

Identifiers

PMID40942468
PMCPMC12429556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.