ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Static and Free-Boundary Vibration Analysis of Egg-Crate Honeycomb Core Sandwich Panels Using the VAM-Based Equivalent Model.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a novel egg-crate honeycomb core sandwich panel (SP-EHC) that combines the structural advantages of conventional lattice and grid configurations while mitigating their limitations in stability and mechanical performance. The design employs chamfered intersecting grid walls to create a semi-enclosed honeycomb architecture, enhancing out-of-plane stiffness and buckling resistance and enabling ventilation and drainage. To facilitate efficient and accurate structural analysis, a two-dimensional equivalent plate model (2D-EPM) is developed using the variational asymptotic method (VAM). This model significantly reduces the complexity of three-dimensional elasticity problems while preserving essential microstructural characteristics. A Reissner-Mindlin-type formulation is derived, enabling local field reconstruction for detailed stress and displacement evaluation. Model validation is conducted through experimental testing and three-dimensional finite element simulations. The 2D-EPM demonstrates high accuracy, with static analysis errors in load-displacement response within 10% and a maximum modal frequency error of 10.23% in dynamic analysis. The buckling and bending analyses, with or without initial deformation, show strong agreement with the 3D-FEM results, with deviations in the critical buckling load not exceeding 5.23%. Local field reconstruction achieves stress and displacement prediction errors below 2.7%, confirming the model's fidelity at both global and local scales. Overall, the VAM-based 2D-EPM provides a robust and computationally efficient framework for the structural analysis and optimization of advanced sandwich panels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.