Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40942415›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Study of the Printing Characteristics of a 3D Printing Solution for the Purpose of Process Optimization.

Shuai Yang, Fei Li, Ya Lu, Xiaoming Xu, Huajie Zhou, Lian Zhou, Yongkang Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shuai YangEngineering Technology Innovation Center of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.
Fei LiEngineering Technology Innovation Center of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3031-5065
Ya LuEngineering Technology Innovation Center of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.
Xiaoming XuChina MCC22 Group Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100062, China.
Huajie ZhouChina MCC22 Group Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100062, China.
Lian ZhouEngineering Technology Innovation Center of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.
Yongkang WeiEngineering Technology Innovation Center of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.

Funding

the National Key Research and Development Plan During the 14th Five-Year Plan Period and National Natural Science Foundation of China 2022YFC3803404 and No.5160802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current research and technical standards primarily rely on observational methods to evaluate the printability of 3D printing materials. There is a lack of quantitative assessment metrics for extrudability and supportability, and experimental data cannot be used to characterize extrudability and buildability. Further research is needed. Based on traditional workability parameters (such as flowability), this study explored the influence of printability characteristics and adopted two quantitative indicators-extrusion uniformity and cumulative deformation rate-to comprehensively evaluate material performance from two aspects, while observing the trend of changes in traditional workability indicators and print quality under experimental conditions. The experimental results showed that the extrusion uniformity of 3D-printed mortar initially improved and then gradually deteriorated as flowability increased, and was inversely proportional to dynamic yield stress. The cumulative deformation rate decreases with the improvement of height retention capability and the increase in static yield stress. Through parameter analysis, the optimal printing performance conditions were determined: when the extrusion uniformity is below 3.3% and the cumulative deformation rate is ≤6%, the corresponding dynamic yield stress range is 200 Pa to 800 Pa, and the static yield stress range is 1800 Pa to 3300 Pa. Under these parameters, the mortar exhibits excellent printing performance, including high-layer stacking capability (≥30 layers) and enhanced structural stability. This experiment demonstrates that using these two quantitative indicators can simply and efficiently evaluate the performance metrics of 3D-printed materials, while also revealing the relationship between the workability and printing quality of 3D-printed recycled micro-powder geopolymer materials.

Indexed as

3D printingcumulative deformation rateextrudabilityextrusion uniformityprinting processrheological propertiessupportabilityworkability

Identifiers

PMID40942415
PMCPMC12428811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.