Testing the Potential of Magnetic Resonance Dosimetry: The Case of Lithium Carbonate.

Alexander Shames, Alexander Panich, Lonia Friedlander, Olga Iliashevsky, Haim Cohen, Raymond Moreh

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander ShamesDepartment of Physics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0574-1911

Alexander PanichDepartment of Physics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0285-8495

Lonia FriedlanderIlse Katz Institute for Nano-Scale Science and Technology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7110-7900

Olga IliashevskyDepartment of Chemistry, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.

Haim CohenDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Exact Science, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4098-8765

Raymond MorehDepartment of Physics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance techniques are powerful, nondestructive, non-invasive tools with broad applications in radiation dosimetry. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) enables direct quantification of dose-dependent radiation-induced paramagnetic defects, while nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) reflects the influence of such defects through changes in line width and nuclear spin relaxation. To date, these methods have typically been applied independently. Their combined use to probe radiation damage in the same material offers new opportunities for comprehensive characterization and preferred dosimetry techniques. In this work, we apply both EPR and NMR to investigate radiation damage in lithium carbonate (Li

Indexed as

electron paramagnetic resonancegamma radiation dosimetrylithium carbonatenuclear magnetic resonancenuclear spin–lattice relaxation timeparamagnetic defects

Identifiers

PMID40942411

DOI10.3390/ma18173986

PMCPMC12429184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.