ArticlePolymers2025
Experimental Investigation of Four-Point Bending Test Results of GFRP and CFRP Composites Used in Wind Turbine Blades.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The depletion of fossil fuels and the rise of environmental concerns have increased the importance of renewable energy sources, positioning wind energy as a key alternative. Modern wind turbine blades are predominantly manufactured from composite materials due to their light weight, high strength, and resistance to corrosion. In offshore applications, approximately 95% of the composite content is glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), while the remaining 5% is carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP). GFRP is favored for its low cost and fatigue resistance, whereas CFRP offers superior strength and stiffness but is limited by high production costs. This study investigates the durability of adhesively bonded GFRP and CFRP joints under marine exposure. Seven-layer GFRP and eight-layer CFRP laminates were produced using a 90° unidirectional twill weave and prepared in accordance with ASTM D5868-01. Specimens were immersed in natural Aegean Sea water (21 °C, salinity 3.3-3.7%) for 1, 2, and 3 months. Measurements revealed that GFRP absorbed significantly more moisture (1.02%, 2.97%, 3.78%) than CFRP (0.49%, 0.76%, 0.91%). Four-point bending tests conducted according to ASTM D790 showed reductions in Young's modulus of up to 9.45% for GFRP and 3.48% for CFRP. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed that moisture-induced degradation was more severe in GFRP joints compared to CFRP. These findings highlight the critical role of environmental exposure in the mechanical performance of marine composite joints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.