Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40942311›Full record

ReviewPolymers2025

Preparation of Multilayer Platforms for Advanced Wound Care Management.

Amir Mohammad Sharafi, Sina Pakkhesal, Farnaz Monajjemzadeh, Nastaran Alipour, Samin Hamidi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amir Mohammad SharafiStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3036-6153
Sina PakkhesalStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Farnaz MonajjemzadehDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Food Control, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9369-5136
Nastaran AlipourDrug Applied Research Center, Department of Medical Nanotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Samin HamidiResearch Center of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multilayer platforms have emerged as promising tools in the field of wound healing, offering a multifaceted approach to promote effective and accelerated tissue regeneration. This review article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the various multilayer platforms employed in wound healing applications, highlighting their structure, fabrication methods, and potential mechanisms of action. The first section of the review focuses on the design and composition of multilayer platforms, encompassing different materials such as polymers, hydrogels, and biocompatible scaffolds. It discusses the significance of each layer in terms of its specific functionalities, including cell adhesion, drug/bioactive factor loading, antimicrobial properties, and mechanical support. The second section of the review delves into the mechanisms of action associated with multilayer platforms in wound healing. It discusses how these platforms facilitate wound closure, promote angiogenesis, modulate inflammation, and enhance tissue regeneration. The article also examines the role of multilayer platforms in providing a physical barrier against external pathogens, reducing the risk of infection, and creating a favorable microenvironment for wound healing. Overall, this review highlights the significant advancements made in the field of multilayer platforms for wound healing and underscores their potential as versatile therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

advanced wound carebioengineeringmultilayer platforms

Identifiers

PMID40942311
PMCPMC12431120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.