Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40942301›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

An Artificial Intelligence-Based Melt Flow Rate Prediction Method for Analyzing Polymer Properties.

Mohammad Anwar Parvez, Ibrahim M Mehedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammad Anwar ParvezDepartment of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6388-901X
Ibrahim M MehediSchool of Robotics, XJTLU Entrepreneur College (Taicang), Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, No. 111 Taicang Ave., Suzhou 215400, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8073-9750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The polymer industry gained increasing importance due to the ability of polymers to replace traditional materials such as wood, glass, and metals in various applications, offering advantages such as high strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and ease of fabrication. Among key performance indicators, melt flow rate (MFR) plays a crucial role in determining polymer quality and processability. However, conventional offline laboratory methods for measuring MFR are time-consuming and unsuitable for real-time quality control in industrial settings. To address this challenge, the study proposes a leveraging artificial intelligence with machine learning-based melt flow rate prediction for polymer properties analysis (LAIML-MFRPPPA) model. A dataset of 1044 polymer samples was used, incorporating six input features such as reactor temperature, pressure, hydrogen-to-propylene ratio, and catalyst feed rate, with MFR as the target variable. The input features were normalized using min-max scaling. Two ensemble models-kernel extreme learning machine (KELM) and random vector functional link (RVFL)-were developed and optimized using the pelican optimization algorithm (POA) for improved predictive accuracy. The proposed method outperformed traditional and deep learning models, achieving an R

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningmelt flow rate predictionpelican optimization algorithmpolymer properties analysis

Identifiers

PMID40942301
PMCPMC12431015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.