Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40942286›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Effect of Biobased and Mineral Additives on the Properties of Recycled Polypropylene Packaging Materials.

Wiktor Wyderkiewicz, Robert Gogolewski, Justyna Miedzianowska-Masłowska, Konrad Szustakiewicz, Marcin Masłowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wiktor WyderkiewiczInstitute of Polymer and Dye Technology, Lodz University of Technology, Stefanowskiego 16, 90-537 Lodz, Poland.
Robert GogolewskiCDM Packaging, Cegielniana 7, 95-054 Ksawerów, Poland.
Justyna Miedzianowska-MasłowskaInstitute of Polymer and Dye Technology, Lodz University of Technology, Stefanowskiego 16, 90-537 Lodz, Poland.
Konrad SzustakiewiczDepartment of Polymer Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2855-852X
Marcin MasłowskiInstitute of Polymer and Dye Technology, Lodz University of Technology, Stefanowskiego 16, 90-537 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3160-8943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recycling of polypropylene (PP) packaging films modified with biobased additives: biochar derived from the pyrolysis of natural fibers and diatomaceous earth was investigated. The aim was to assess the impact of these modifiers on the processing, rheological, mechanical, and thermal properties of the recycled material. The processing behavior was evaluated through extrusion with granulation to determine industrial applicability. Rheological properties, including viscosity and melt flow index (MFI), were measured to characterize flow behavior. Mechanical performance was assessed through tensile strength, hardness, three-point bending, and impact resistance tests. Thermal properties were analyzed using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Vicat softening temperature (VST), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results demonstrate that incorporating biochar and diatomaceous earth can modify and, in selected cases, enhance the processing and performance characteristics of recycled PP films, though their impact on thermal behavior is parameter-specific. While diatomaceous earth slightly increased the onset of thermal degradation (T

Indexed as

biocharcompositesdiatomaceous earthfunctional propertiespackaging materialspolypropylene foilsrecycling

Identifiers

PMID40942286
PMCPMC12431612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.