ArticlePolymers2025
Effects of Poly(ethylene oxide) on the Foam Properties of Anionic Surfactants: Experiment and Molecular Dynamics Simulation.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water-soluble polymers are often used as additives to adjust the foam properties of surfactant. In this study, the effects of water-soluble polymer poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) on foam properties of two anionic surfactants, i.e., ammonium lauryl ether sulfate (ALES) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), were investigated by experimental and molecular dynamics simulation methods. Experimental results show that the addition of PEO can reduce the foaming ability of the two surfactants, but the inhibitory effect of PEO on the foaming ability is weakened at high surfactant concentration. Compared with ALES, PEO has a more significant inhibitory effect on the foaming ability of SDS. With the increase in PEO concentration, the half-life time of foam drainage in surfactant/water-soluble polymer composite systems gradually increases. The synergistic effect between PEO and ALES is stronger than that between PEO and SDS, resulting in a longer half-life time of foam drainage in ALES/PEO composite system. Molecular dynamics simulation results indicate that the addition of PEO can decline the air-water interface thickness of bubble films and the tail tilt angle of surfactant molecules at the air-water interface. The reduction in tail tilt angle means that the surfactant molecules are more vertical to the air-water interface and the hydrophobic interaction between adjacent tail chains of surfactants is weakened, which is unfavorable to the formation of bubble films, thus decreasing the foaming ability of surfactants. Because the ALES/PEO system has larger air-water interface thickness and surfactant tail tilt angle than the SDS/PEO system, the inhibitory effect of PEO on the foaming ability of ALES is weaker than that of SDS. Adding PEO can lower the peak position of the first hydration layer of surfactant head groups, increase the number of hydrogen bonds, and reduce the diffusion coefficient of water molecules, so that the surfactant/water-soluble polymer system has longer half-life time of foam drainage than the pure surfactant system. Due to the synergistic effect between ALES and PEO, the ALES/PEO system has a higher peak value of the first hydration layer of surfactant head groups, more hydrogen bonds, and lower diffusion coefficient of water molecules than the SDS/PEO system. Therefore, the half-life time of foam drainage in the ALES/PEO system is longer than that in the SDS/PEO system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.