ArticlePolymers2025
Assessment of Additively Manufactured Thermoplastic Composites for Ablative Thermal Protection Systems (TPSs).
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study focused on the thermal stability and ablative behavior assessment of five newly developed composite TPS configurations. All ten test samples were 3D printed via FDM using various fire-retardant thermoplastic materials, with and without reinforcement. Eight samples integrated a new thermal management internal air chamber conceptualized architecture. A prompt feasible approach for the flame resistance preliminary assessment of ablative TPS samples was developed, using an in-house oxy-acetylene torch test bench. Experimental OTB ablation tests involved exposing the front surface samples to direct flame at 1450 ± 50 °C at 100 mm distance. For each configuration, two samples were tested: one subjected to 30 s of flame exposure and the other to 60 s. During testing, internal temperatures were measured at two backside sample contact points. Recorded temperatures remained below 46 °C, significantly under the maximum allowable back face temperature of 180 °C set for TPSs. The highest mass losses were measured for PC and PETG FR materials, achieving around 19% (30 s) and, respectively, 36% (60 s), while the reinforced configurations showed overall only a third of this reduction. The study's major outcomes were the internal air chamber concept validation and identifying two reinforced configurations as strong candidates for the further development of 3D-printed ablative TPSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.