ReviewPolymers2025
Plant-Based Biofillers for Polymer Composites: Characterization, Surface Modification, and Application Potential.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical, Tensile, and Microstructural Properties of Jute/False Banana Fiber-Reinforced Unsaturated Polyester Resin Composites.Polymers · 2026Article
- PFAS and Microplastics: Are Biodegradable Microplastics Less Harmful to the Environment?Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mounting global concern regarding the accumulation of plastic waste underscores the necessity for the development of innovative solutions, with particular emphasis on the incorporation of plant-based biofillers into polymer composites as a sustainable alternative to conventional materials. This review provides a comprehensive and structured overview of the recent progress (2020-2025) in the integration of plant-based biofillers into both thermoplastic and thermosetting polymer matrices, with a focus on surface modification techniques, physicochemical characterization, and emerging industrial applications. Unlike the prior literature, this work highlights the dual environmental and material benefits of using plant-derived fillers, particularly in the context of waste valorization and circular material design. By clearly identifying a current research gap-the limited scalability and processing efficiency of biofillers-this review proposes a strategy in which plant-derived materials function as key enablers for sustainable composite development. Special attention is given to extraction methods of lignocellulosic fillers from renewable agricultural waste streams and their subsequent functionalization to improve matrix compatibility. Additionally, it delineates the principal approaches for biofiller modification, demonstrating how their properties can be tailored to meet specific needs in biocomposite production. This critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art literature not only reinforces the role of biofillers in reducing dependence on non-renewable fillers but also outlines future directions in scaling up their use, improving durability, and expanding performance capabilities of sustainable composites. Overall, the presented analysis contributes novel insights into the material design, processing strategies, and potential of plant biofillers as central elements in next-generation green composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.