ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Reliability and Usefulness of Seedling Plant Data in Cassava Breeding.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cassava breeding traditionally involves several years of phenotypic evaluation and field selection. The process begins with seedling evaluation trials (SETs), followed by single row trials (SRTs), and then progresses through preliminary, advanced and uniform yield trials. In recent years, significant efforts have been made to shorten the cassava breeding cycle through genomic selection, which relies on genotypically estimated breeding values (GEBVs). Breeders have typically performed visual selection during the SET stage, when each genotype in segregating populations is represented by a single plant. Despite the intense selection pressure applied at this stage-often eliminating 80-90% of genotypes-no data are collected prior to selection. As a result, breeders miss the opportunity to assess the degree and direction of dominance for key cassava traits, which remains largely unknown. This study provides pioneering insights based on seedling data collected over three years of field evaluations, along with the performance of selected genotypes at the SRT stage. Beyond its relevance for conventional inheritance studies, SET data can also be used to estimate phenotypically estimated breeding values (PEBVs) of progenitors, serving a similar purpose to GEBVs in genomic selection strategies. In fact, these two approaches to estimating breeding values can be highly complementary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.