ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluation of Peanut Physiological Responses to Heat and Drought Stress Across Growth Chamber and Field Environments.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physiological and Yield Responses of Peanut (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heat-exacerbated drought stress is becoming increasingly common in crop production systems, including peanuts, yet limited information exists on how peanut cultivars respond to this combined stress. While controlled environments allow for the isolation of these stress effects, their relevance to field conditions remains unclear. In this study, five Virginia-type peanut cultivars were evaluated under four treatments in a growth chamber environment, i.e., control, heat, drought, and combined heat and drought stress; and under two treatments in the field environment, i.e., rainfed control, and combined heat and drought stress using rainout shelters. The physiological traits assessed included stomatal conductance and transpiration rate, as well as leaf temperature difference. In both environments, combined heat and drought resulted in a significant decline in physiological performance compared to control conditions. On average, stomatal conductance decreased by 65% in the growth chamber and 21% in the field under combined heat and drought stress, while transpiration was reduced by 49% and 24%, respectively. In the growth chamber, leaf temperature difference increased by 40% under combined stress, whereas it was not statistically different under field conditions. Correlations of the physiological responses between growth chamber and field were stronger under combined stress conditions than under control conditions. Principal component analysis revealed clear genotypic separation based on gas exchange and thermal traits, with NC 20 and Sullivan consistently associated with higher stomatal conductance and transpiration under stress across environments, indicating greater physiological resilience, while Emery clustered with traits linked to stress susceptibility. These findings underscore the significant impacts of combined stress in peanut production and highlight the importance of evaluating cultivar responses under both controlled and field environments to guide crop improvement strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.