Accuracy and Reproducibility of Handheld 3D Ultrasound Versus Conventional 2D Ultrasound for Urinary Bladder Volume Measurement: A Prospective Comparative Study.

Abdulrahman M Alfuraih, Saleh K S Alkuwileet, Abdulmalik K Alhoysin, Abdulmajed S Alhawwashi, Abdullah I Aldakan, Fahad K Alotaibi, Mohammed J Alsaadi

Abstract read

PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher

In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdulrahman M AlfuraihRadiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4655-7248

Saleh K S AlkuwileetRadiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.

Abdulmalik K AlhoysinRadiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.

Abdulmajed S AlhawwashiRadiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.

Abdullah I AldakanRadiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.

Fahad K AlotaibiRadiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.

Mohammed J AlsaadiRadiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0560-0403

Funding

Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University PSAU/2023/01/9000

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

3D ultrasoundbedside ultrasoundbladder scannerbladder volume measurementhandheld ultrasound deviceinter-operator reproducibilitymeasurement accuracypoint-of-care ultrasoundpost-void residual urineurinary bladder volume

Identifiers

PMID40941716

DOI10.3390/diagnostics15172229

PMCPMC12428280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.