Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40941651›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Tissue Biomarkers in Urothelial Carcinoma In Situ: A Narrative Review.

Francesca Sanguedolce, Angelo Cormio, Magda Zanelli, Maurizio Zizzo, Andrea Palicelli, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Giulio Milanese, Andrea Benedetto Galosi, Roberta Mazzucchelli, Luigi Cormio and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesca SanguedolcePathology Unit, Policlinico Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Angelo CormioDepartment of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Magda ZanelliPathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8733-9933
Maurizio ZizzoSurgical Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9841-7856
Andrea PalicelliPathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2299-5160
Ugo Giovanni FalagarioDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Giulio MilaneseDepartment of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Andrea Benedetto GalosiDepartment of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Roberta MazzucchelliSection of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, United Hospitals, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Luigi CormioDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Giuseppe CarrieriDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urothelial carcinoma in situ (UCIS) is a high-grade non-muscle-invasive neoplasm with significant clinical implications due to its potential for progression to muscle-invasive disease. Accurate diagnosis and risk stratification are crucial for appropriate management, particularly given the variability in response to intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy. While the diagnosis of UCIS primarily relies on morphological criteria, immunohistochemical (IHC) markers serve as valuable ancillary tools, particularly in challenging cases. Markers such as CK20, CD44, p53, and Ki-67 have been extensively studied, though none demonstrate complete sensitivity or specificity. Additionally, molecular classification has identified luminal and basal subtypes, with potential prognostic and therapeutic implications. Recent studies have also explored predictive biomarkers for BCG response, including PD-L1, whose expression correlates with recurrence and potential responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging targeted therapies, such as enfortumab vedotin, have shown promise, with nectin-4 overexpression observed in most UCIS cases. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including interobserver variability in morphological assessment, heterogeneous IHC methodologies, and the need for standardized molecular testing. This review highlights the current understanding of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive tissue biomarkers in UCIS, underscoring the potential role of molecular profiling in guiding personalized treatment strategies. Future research should focus on refining biomarker-driven classification systems to improve risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making in UCIS patients.

Indexed as

bacillus Calmette-Guérinbiomarkersbladder cancerCD44CK20immunohistochemistryKi-67nectin-4p53PD-L1urothelial carcinoma in situ

Identifiers

PMID40941651
PMCPMC12428764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.