ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Quality of Life in Short Stature: Comparisons Between Normal Variants Short-Statured and Normal-Statured Children and Adolescents and Agreement with Their Parents.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of anatomic complexity of congenital heart disease on growth retardation: a large retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate quality of life in children and adolescents with normal variants of short stature compared to age- and sex-matched individuals with normal stature and to assess the agreement between children/adolescents-reported and parent-reported outcomes.
methodsA total of 65 child-parent dyads were enrolled, including 29 children and adolescents with short stature (15 males, 14 females; mean age: 11.2 + 2.0 years; mean height standard deviation score, HSDS: -2.10 + 0.57) and 36 children and adolescents with normal stature (19 males, 17 females; mean age: 11.3 + 1.93 years; mean HSDS: 0.56 + 0.78). Quality of life was assessed using the Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth (QoLISSY) questionnaire. Statistical analyses included independent samples
resultsAmong short-statured children and adolescents, no significant correlations were found between HSDS and all domains of quality of life. Short-statured children and adolescents exhibited significantly lower QoL across all domains compared to their normal-statured peers. Coping was higher in children and adolescents with short stature compared to their peers of normal stature. Similarly, parents of short-statured children and adolescents perceived a lower QoL for their sons and daughters and reported greater concern about the future and a more perceived personal impact than parents of normal-statured children and adolescents. No statistically significant differences were found between sons/daughters and parent reports, indicating a relatively high level of agreement in quality of life (QoL) perceptions.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the psychosocial impact of short stature and highlight the importance of incorporating both child and parent perspectives in the clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.